|
| |
| Table 2a. Total area of habit in
3 shoreline segments of Minnesota's North Shore with respect to shallow (<60 ft) and
deep (>60 ft) habitat in 8 substrate categories. |
| |
*SBay/KennedyCrk |
*Sugarloaf/Tofte |
*TerracePt/GMarais |
| Percentage |
shallow |
deep |
shallow |
deep |
shallow |
deep |
| Sand |
5.63 |
23.61 |
4.70 |
16.90 |
1.24 |
11.55 |
| Sand+Cobble |
5.19 |
29.54 |
10.06 |
18.35 |
4.00 |
36.70 |
| Sand/Bedrock |
0.16 |
3.63 |
0.71 |
0.82 |
0.09 |
6.71 |
| Smooth Bedrock |
1.46 |
0.74 |
3.34 |
0.59 |
1.13 |
0.35 |
| Rough Bedrock |
6.21 |
13.63 |
9.07 |
4.66 |
19.24 |
25.98 |
| Conglomerate |
23.91 |
48.15 |
26.66 |
25.47 |
94.50 |
54.25 |
| Cobble |
17.76 |
15.81 |
30.55 |
16.01 |
2.44 |
5.44 |
| Boulders |
4.88 |
1.34 |
13.64 |
5.98 |
0.23 |
0.06 |
| Unknown hard/smooth |
0.64 |
0.06 |
0.17 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.17 |
| Unknown soft/rough |
5.96 |
5.65 |
1.51 |
0.94 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| Total |
71.81 |
142.16 |
100.42 |
89.72 |
122.87 |
141.20 |
| * Shoreline segments were not
completely surveyed due to vessel size and other logistic constraints. |
| Table 2b. Percent of total area
in 3 shoreline segments of Minnesota's North Shore with respect to shallow (<60 ft) and deep (>60 ft) habitat
in 8 substrate categories. |
| |
*SBay/KennedyCrk |
*Sugarloaf/Tofte |
*TerracePt/GMarais |
| Percentage |
shallow |
deep |
shallow |
deep |
shallow |
deep |
| Sand |
7.8 |
16.6 |
4.7 |
18.8 |
1.0 |
8.2 |
| Sand+Cobble |
7.2 |
20.8 |
10.0 |
20.5 |
3.3 |
26.0 |
| Sand/Bedrock |
0.2 |
2.6 |
0.7 |
0.9 |
0.1 |
4.8 |
| Smooth Bedrock |
2.0 |
0.5 |
3.3 |
0.7 |
0.9 |
0.2 |
| Rough Bedrock |
8.6 |
9.6 |
9.0 |
5.2 |
15.7 |
18.4 |
| Conglomerate |
33.3 |
33.9 |
26.6 |
28.4 |
76.9 |
38.4 |
| Cobble |
24.7 |
11.1 |
30.4 |
17.8 |
2.0 |
3.9 |
| Boulders |
6.8 |
0.9 |
13.6 |
6.7 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
| Unknown hard/smooth |
0.9 |
0.0 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
| Unknown soft/rough |
8.3 |
4.0 |
1.5 |
1.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
| Total |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
100.00 |
| * Shoreline segments were not
completely surveyed due to vessel size and other logistic constraints. |
|